Understanding Connection in Relationships: Self, Others, and the Space Between

Much of my work, both in the counselling room and in my writing, centres on how we relate to ourselves, how we relate to others, and how connection is formed between us. These three areas are deeply interconnected, yet they are often confused or collapsed into one another. When that happens, relationships can feel intense, fragile, or disappointing, without it being clear why.

Connection is often spoken about as something we either have or lack. People describe feeling disconnected, lonely, unseen, or misunderstood, usually in relation to other people. Yet connection does not begin with others, and it does not exist solely within us either. It forms across three interrelated domains:
​

1. The relationship we have with ourselves
2. The way we relate to others
3. The shared space that emerges between

When one of these areas is neglected or misunderstood, relationships can feel strained, fragile, or confusing. When all three are attended to, connection becomes more grounded, flexible, and emotionally honest.

The relationship with self
Our first and most enduring relationship is the one we have with ourselves. Long before we learn how to relate to others, we are forming an internal relationship with our own thoughts, feelings, bodily sensations, and needs. This relationship shapes how we experience emotion, how we interpret what happens to us, and how safely we can remain present when things feel uncomfortable or uncertain.

From a humanistic perspective, the quality of this internal relationship is fundamental. It is closely linked to awareness, self-acceptance, and congruence. Awareness allows us to notice what is happening within us. Self-acceptance allows us to stay with that experience without judgement. Congruence allows what we feel internally to be reflected honestly in how we live and relate. When these elements are present, we experience a greater sense of internal coherence. When they are absent, inner conflict often follows.

Many people have learned, often very early, that certain emotions are problematic. Anger may have been labelled dangerous. Sadness may have been dismissed. Needs may have been experienced as weakness. Over time, these messages shape an internal environment where parts of the self are pushed aside rather than understood. The relationship with ourselves becomes conditional, with only certain feelings allowed to exist.

Consider someone who feels persistent frustration in their relationships but struggles to name it. They may notice irritation building, followed by withdrawal or resentment, yet remain unclear about what they actually need. The feeling itself is not the problem. Frustration often signals something important, such as a boundary being crossed or a need going unmet. The difficulty lies not in the feeling, but in a lack of relationship with our inner world. Without awareness and acceptance, emotions remain unprocessed and difficult to respond to directly. Instead, they find indirect expression through sarcasm, emotional distance, or sudden conflict.

This is where many relational difficulties begin. When we are disconnected from our inner experience, we are more likely to look outward for resolution. We may expect others to soothe us, to reassure us, or to respond to needs we have not yet recognised ourselves. In these moments, relationships quietly shift from connection towards demand, even when that demand is unspoken.

Humanistic thinking emphasises that emotions are not obstacles to be managed, but signals to be listened to. When we are able to turn towards our internal experience with curiosity rather than criticism, something changes. Feelings become sources of information rather than threats. Needs become clearer. Choice becomes possible.

Difficulties often arise when the relationship with ourselves is strained or underdeveloped. If we have learned that our inner world is unreliable, excessive, or inconvenient, we may habitually look outward for regulation or validation. Without realising it, we may ask others to carry emotional weight that belongs within our own internal world. This can place pressure on relationships and create patterns of disappointment or dependence.

A strong relationship with the self is not about self sufficiency or emotional isolation. It is not about coping alone or needing no one. It is about being able to stay with our own experience long enough to understand it, to name it, and to take responsibility for it. From this position, connection with others becomes a choice rather than a necessity driven by unmet internal needs.

When the relationship with ourselves is grounded, we enter relationships with greater clarity. We are less reactive because we are less afraid of our own inner world. We are more able to tolerate difference, uncertainty, and emotional complexity. In this sense, the relationship with the self is not separate from our relationships with others. It quietly shapes every connection that follows.

Meeting the other
Every relationship brings us into contact with someone whose inner world is distinct from our own. Each person carries their own history, relational patterns, fears, hopes, and ways of making sense of connection. Yet we do not encounter others as blank slates. We meet them through the lens of our own experience, shaped by past relationships and internal expectations about closeness, safety, and belonging.

Attachment theory offers a useful way of understanding how early relational experiences influence what we expect from others. Experiences of reliability, inconsistency, or emotional absence can shape how we interpret closeness and distance in adulthood. Humanistic and existential perspectives add further depth, reminding us that while our past shapes us, we remain responsible for how we respond to one another in the present.

This means that the same behaviour can carry very different meanings for different people. A delayed reply to a message may feel neutral or insignificant to one person, while for another it may evoke feelings of rejection, anxiety, or abandonment. The difference is rarely about the message itself. It lies in the personal meanings attached to absence, responsiveness, and emotional availability, often formed long before the current relationship began.

When our relationship with ourselves is uncertain or underdeveloped, it becomes harder to truly encounter the other as they are. Instead of meeting a separate person, we may meet our own fears, needs, or assumptions reflected back at us. Someone who struggles with self-worth may unconsciously seek frequent reassurance, interpreting ordinary independence as a lack of care. Another person may protect themselves from vulnerability by maintaining emotional distance, framing closeness as pressure or obligation.

In these moments, the other person becomes less a separate individual and more a surface onto which unresolved internal material is projected. Difference can feel unsettling rather than enriching. Misunderstandings are experienced as rejection. Disagreement can feel personal or threatening. The relationship becomes organised around managing anxiety rather than deepening connection.

Genuine connection requires recognition of separateness. It involves allowing the other to be other, with their own inner world, limits, and ways of relating. This does not mean indifference or emotional withdrawal. It means engaging without trying to control, fix, or collapse differences. It requires tolerating uncertainty and the discomfort that can accompany closeness.

From a humanistic perspective, meeting the other involves presence rather than performance. It asks us to remain open, curious, and responsible for our own responses. When we can hold ourselves more steadily, we are better able to listen, to reflect, and to respond rather than react.

This is not about emotional distance. It is about contact that respects both self and other. When difference is acknowledged rather than defended against, relationships have more room to breathe. Connection becomes something that emerges through mutual presence, rather than something that is demanded or secured through fear.

The space between
While much attention is often given to self-awareness and individual relational patterns, the space that forms between people is frequently overlooked. Yet it is within this shared relational space that connection is actually lived and experienced. It does not sit within either person alone, but emerges through interaction, presence, and response.

The space between is not owned or controlled by one individual. It is co-created, moment by moment, through how two people speak, listen, respond, and make sense of one another. It holds tone as much as content. It carries emotional safety, trust, and unspoken expectations about what is permitted and what may threaten connection. Over time, this space develops a character of its own, shaped by repeated experiences of attunement, moments of misattunement, and repair. In my book Life’s Three Fires, I describe this process as mutual tending.

When this space is tended with care, it can feel warm, steady, and alive. Difference can be held without threat. Disagreement does not immediately lead to rupture. There is room for uncertainty, humour, and emotional movement. When the space is neglected or overwhelmed, it can become brittle or charged. Even small interactions begin to carry disproportionate weight, and people may find themselves bracing rather than engaging.

Consider two people who care deeply about one another, yet find themselves returning to the same argument again and again. Each feels unheard. Each believes the other is not trying hard enough. Over time, the issue itself becomes less important than the atmosphere surrounding it. The shared space becomes organised around defensiveness and self-protection. Conversations that might once have felt neutral or curious now feel risky, as though one wrong step could trigger another difficult exchange.

A healthy connection is not about emotional merging or the absence of boundaries. Nor is it about rigid separation that avoids vulnerability. It is about creating a shared space where both individuals can remain present, differentiated, and emotionally available. This requires tolerating tension without rushing to resolve it, and staying engaged even when things feel uncomfortable.

Crucially, this space is shaped not only by what goes well, but by how difficulty is handled. Misunderstandings are inevitable. What matters is the capacity to notice impact with awareness, to remain humble, to take responsibility for our part, and to seek clarity and repair. Repair does not mean blame or submission. It means recognising when something has shifted in the space between, and being willing to address it.

When repair is possible, the relational space becomes more resilient. Trust is not built through the absence of difficulty, but through repeated experiences of rupture and return. In this way, the space between becomes not just a site of connection, but a place of growth.

Bringing the three together
Difficulties in relationships often arise when one aspect of connection is prioritised at the expense of the others. Over-focusing on the self can lead to withdrawal, rigidity, or emotional self-protection. Over-focusing on the other can result in loss of self, over-accommodation, or emotional dependency. When the shared space between is neglected, relationships can become stuck in cycles of misunderstanding, where the same issues repeat without resolution.

These imbalances rarely reflect a lack of care. More often, they arise because one part of the relationship is being asked to carry the work of all three. The relationship with self gives us awareness and clarity, allowing us to respond from a steadier headspace rather than react from confusion or threat. The relationship with the other invites empathy and compassionate understanding, giving us a genuine chance of seeing them as they are. The shared space between is where we bring our congruent selves into contact with another person, and where alignment is built. When all three are tended, relational harmony becomes more possible.

Consider someone who is highly attuned to others but disconnected from their own internal experience. They may consistently prioritise harmony at the cost of honesty, avoiding discomfort in order to preserve closeness. Over time, unexpressed needs accumulate as resentment. When this eventually surfaces, it can appear disproportionate or confusing, both to themselves and to others. The difficulty lies not in caring too much, but in losing contact with the self.

Conversely, someone who is deeply self-focused but inattentive to the shared space may remain clear about their own needs while overlooking the impact of their behaviour. Their intentions may be genuine, yet others experience them as distant or unresponsive. Without attention to the relational space between, self-clarity alone is not enough to sustain connection.

When the relationship with self is grounded, engaging with another person becomes less threatening. When the other is met with openness rather than assumption, difference becomes more tolerable. When the shared space is tended with care, both individuals are more able to remain present and engaged without losing themselves. Growth does not occur within one area alone, but through the ongoing movement between all three.

This is not a static achievement or a fixed state. Relationships are living processes. They shift as people grow, as circumstances change, and as new challenges emerge. The work of connection is not about perfection or constant harmony. It is about awareness, responsibility, and a willingness to stay engaged, even when it would be easier to withdraw or defend.

A final reflection
Connection is not something that happens to us by chance. It is something we participate in, often without realising it, through the relationship we have with ourselves, the way we sit with others, and the care we give to the space that forms between. When difficulties arise, they are rarely located in just one place. More often, they reflect an imbalance across these three areas, where one is carrying what the others cannot.

Developing awareness in this way does not offer quick fixes or simple answers. What it offers instead is clarity. It helps us recognise where responsibility lies, where choice still exists, and where change becomes possible. From a humanistic perspective, this clarity matters. It supports movement away from blame or self-criticism, and towards understanding, agency, and more honest contact.

This way of thinking continues to shape how I understand relationships, emotional well-being, and growth. It underpins my therapeutic work, and it forms the foundation of my writing, including Life’s Three Fires, where these ideas are explored in greater depth through reflection, theory, and lived relational patterns.

George Fortune Counselling